Cutting it short
If there’s one thing all people with diabetes have in common (or, who’ve had it for at least a year), it’s that we take shortcuts.
At one time, it was shameful and embarrassing. I remember my father once giving me a stern lecture about my taking shortcuts. (Maybe it was about diabetes, maybe it was about homework. I really don’t remember).
Nowadays, taking shortcuts aren’t only tolerated, but they’re expected. They’re celebrated. Shortcuts are a sign of confidence and independence. Only the timid and hesitant do things the long way.
(Last week, I attended a demo of ShugaTrak, a simple and easy way for parents to keep track of their kids’ blood sugars via automated text messages. I’ll write more about that sometime soon. When the presentation began with the loading a new lancet in the Delica device, I sarcastically asked what that step was for, much to the amusement of the crowd).
But where do these shortcuts come from? Are they learned or taught? There was a time when I did everything by-the-book, and I’m not quite sure what made me change.
Remember: I’m not a doctor and this isn’t medical advice. In fact, everything discussed below is wrong, and should never be done. Never, ever, ever. This post is written only for the purpose of telling stories of my past, and I disclaim responsibility from any ideas or actions someone else might try as a result of my own rebelliousness.
Perhaps the most popular of shortcuts is the changing of lancets after each blood sugar test. And I used to do that — all the time. It wasn’t tough. There was no cap to unscrew, because the Autolet kept the lancet in plain sight : all the time. And you couldn’t put the device away with the old lancet in place, because there was no protection from the sharp point.
I think they wanted you to change the platform – the thing you put your finger up against before it got speared – each time, too. But those things would always snap when I tried to pull it out of the slot, leading me to try to pull the broken tab out with some combination of tweezers, screwdrivers, paper clips, and old lancets. That “rule” was dismissed quickly.
Regardless, my meter was so cumbersome and my bag-o’-crap was so damn big that it was really no big deal to throw a few handfuls of lancets in there with everything else.
Then the meters shrunk, and the lancers became safer. When the Autoclix replaced the Autolet, I realized that I could stash my lancer in my bag without worrying about poking myself accidentally. And then I got lazy replacing the lancet, and so it began….
Drip, drip, drip…
But even before the Autolet and the blood tests was Clinitest, the little paper cups, and the eye-dropper full of pee. Get the test-tube, add two drops of urine, then ten drops of water.
Who has time to count out ten drops of water? So I would estimate it. I’d quickly fill the test-tube with an amount of water I eyeballed to be ten drops. In reality, it was probably more, since my 5% bright-orange glucose concentrations often came out as less (green) – or none (blue). If urine tests were really worth anything, it would explain why my logs from home didn’t match the A1C’s from the lab.
Besides, I was justified. A “drop” is an imprecise measurement, and I was playing with poison. The box itself said so: POISON, in big red letters. Once I started the test, I had to get the hell out of there, fast.
This may not have been a shortcut as much as it was a way to avoid a lecture. But back in the day, we took prescribed amounts of insulin, and ate prescribed amounts of food to match the insulin. There was no dosing insulin to match the food — it work the other way.
At one of my pediatric endo appointments, a young student-doctor who was trying to gain my trust asked me (while the regular endocrinologist was chatting with my parents in anther room): “did you ever sneak more insulin so you could eat more food and not get caught?”
Umm…. no, but that’s not a bad idea… thanks!
The pen needle
This shortcut was just asking to be taken. The insulin pen was supposed to make my life easier, so I could just carry a pen in my pocket rather than rummage through my bag-o’-crap. Of course, the pen needles didn’t fit comfortably in my pocket, and they were a real bitch to re-cap after use anyway (I think you are supposed to throw them directly in the sharps container after use rather than re-cap them… like anyone carries one of those red buckets around with them.) I believe that use of insulin pen needles was the first set of directions given by medical professionals with an undocumented wink, wink, nod, nod.
The Continuous Glucose Monitoring sensor is probably the second set of directions given with a wink, wink, nod, nod. They might as well have just put a “Restart Old Sensor” menu item in the receiver. Pride and comfort in doing the right thing completely goes out the window when it comes to the CGM. I think there’s a line in the manual that says “Selecting Start New Sensor will reset the 3-day clock to the beginning and will require an immediate calibration if the sensor has already been worn for the two-hour warm-up period. Per FDA regulations, it should only be used with new sensors and not previously worn ones.”
I’ll bet you saw the title of this post and figured it wouldn’t ramble on and on like most of the things I write. I’m sorry to have disappointed you. But I did skip the part about overfilling reservoirs and treating to CGM readings. Not to mention SWAGging (am I supposed to double the “g” in that word?). But to my original point, some shortcuts are learned, some are taught. Taking them means you’re confident in doing so, and encountering the risks they may entail.
There’s no shame in that.You’re welcome.
Posted on July 23, 2013, in Diabetes, Personal, Type 1. Bookmark the permalink. 26 Comments.
::wink, wink, nod, nod:: was pretty much how I treated my management back in the 80s. All of my shortcuts, in retrospect, weren’t…
What a fun post–you revealed the secrets of the stars.
Oh, how I wish there were a Restart Old Sensor menu choice on Dexcom. All that’s happening during the warm-up time is “wetting,” right? (And maybe 2 hours of guilt while the green pieces of pie fill up the circle and the beloved machine thinks it’s doing something useful.) Maybe they could create an FDA workaround for people with bodies that—miraculously & twice a month—are so wet that the filament is fully wet immediately?
It’s so interesting (and funny) to see how things have evolved. We’ve only been doing this six months and I’m trying to think if we’ve made any short cuts yet. I feel like there is a fine line between “taking short cuts” and “learning” if you know what I mean!
I’m with you on the shortcuts. The D takes so many little slices of time, cutting out a few of those just helps me feel a BIT in control (not of BGs). I hated those Clinitest tablets and used them for over 5 years. Yuk.
I’m making this #dblogcheck week.
Whoa that’s a scary looking lancet! How about testing from paper cuts and other injuries to avoid lancing all together?
Well, I haven’t gotten paper cuts SPECIFICALLY to avoid lancing, but when I did get such a cut, I certainly would exploit the opportunity.
I was definitely referring to exploiting the opportunity… who wants a paper cut?
I remember those lancing devices… I’m pretty sure I had nightmares about them as a child.
I’m with Katy – I wish there was a restart current sensor option on the Dexcom that didn’t require the 2 hour wait for calibration.
The Medtronic doesn’t require a 2-hour calibration after a restart. (wink, wink, nod, nod!). In fact, if you calibrate THEN immediately restart, it doesn’t ask at all…
But can you wear the Medtronic CGM sensor for 3 weeks? 😉
Sure! With copious amounts of construction-grade adhesive and a high tolerance for discomfort you can. But it probably won’t work for that long, so there’s really no reason to try.
I’ve never seen one of those lancing devices. But they look like they date from the Spanish Inquisition…
Great post. I hadn’t thought about the CGM thing as a shortcut, but I suppose it is. Cool to hear about some of the shortcuts with older management tool.
I’m definitely in the extending my Dexcom out as far as I can camp. My best so far is 21 days before it was less reliable. I admit though that I’m also of the camp where I DO change my lancet at every test but mainly bc I use the Accu-Chek FastClix and like the idea of clicking the barrel around for a fresh needle. It’s a sad soothing sound, ROFL. :p
One request from my endo at our last visit… Colleen, please change your lancet more often. So, I have.
Now all we need is a shortcut to the cure…
Loved this – and the comments! Man, I was cracking up at some of them!
I had a lancet device like that except mine was dark blue. I flinch just looking at it.
This was greatness. (I feel like I say that a lot in your comments!)
Perhaps you do (and thank you!), but I have no idea who you are. I guess that’s what happens when you allow anonymous comments for #dblogcheck day. I should really turn that off…
Now that I know who you are… I fixed it. Always nice to hear from you!
Oh my goodness-I can’t believe the old lancet device! I was diagnosed in 1993 so this must have been sometime in the 80s? I love this post by the way…the CGM sensor trick made my life about 1,000 times better once I discovered it 🙂
Yes, the Autolet was early 80s. 1981-1982 range, or thereabouts (maybe earlier). The Autoclix made an appearance, I’m guessing, in 1982.
Pingback: All I ever needed to know I learned in 7th grade | Rolling in the D
Pingback: July comment contest | Rolling in the D